Go to the content | to the menu | to the searchText mode Bottom ↓

Knowledge base
of the Mascarene’s corals

Home page » Services » Documents » Noël Conruyt’s PhD (1994)
Personal identifiers

Enter your name and email address here. You will receive your personal identifier shortly by email.

IREMIA lab - University of La Réunion

LIS lab - UPMC Paris

CBETM lab - EPHE - University of Perpignan

BtBs lab - University of Milano

ECOMAR lab - University of La Réunion

SHOALS - Rodrigues island

Albion Fisheries Research Center - Mauritius island

Noël Conruyt’s PhD (1994)

Amélioration de la robustesse des systèmes d’aide à la description, à la classification et à la détermination des objets biologiques

Published the 27 April 2009, updated the 20 July 2009

All the versions of this article:

Paris IX - Dauphine University thesis - Noël Conruyt - 24th of May 1994 at Paris IX - Dauphine University.

- Amélioration de la robustesse des systèmes d’aide à la description, à la classification et à la détermination des objets biologiques (PDF, 1,6 Mo, in french) (HTML/web pages, in french)

Abstract :

Our approach of robustness for systems that help to describe, classify and identify biological objects is based on the application of the scientific method in biology (experimenting and testing), in order to help naturalists to understand their domain better, test their opinions, and transmit their knowledge. We have built user-friendly computer tools to allow the construction of structured and pre-classified descriptions (the examples), to learn inductive hypothesis (classifications), and test them with new observations (by identification). The quality of descriptions is fundamental for the learning process. Besides, they must be comparable, and so rely on a descriptive model that the expert must explicitly represent and structure. To help him, we have stressed some observational mechanisms from monographs published in scientific literature. The model corresponds to the objects that can be observed in the domain: they are represented in a description tree. Then, a questionnaire that matches the descriptive model is automatically built; it allows the biologist to use it as an observation guide, to acquire observed descriptions and build a case base that is consistent with the model. Two different types of technology can be used in order to process the case base, depending on the goal to be achieved. For classification purposes, a decision tree is developed using inductive learning from examples to characterize the classes. For identification purposes, a case based reasoning strategy is used. It dynamically extracts the most efficient descriptors and produces better identifications than by following a path of a decision tree. Nevertheless, inductive learning as well as the repetitive use of the questionnaire remains useful for detecting possible inconsistencies within the cases library, thus allowing a validation of the descriptive model. The method proposed here gives to the expert the ability to update the knowledge base according to the results obtained during classification and/or identification, and thus improve iteratively his descriptive model and case base. This process brings more robustness and leads to the elaboration of more powerful CAT (Computer Assisted Taxonomy) tools.

RSS 2.0 [ ? ] • Site created with SPIPCreditsTerms of UseToP ↑
cc by nc  Content on this page is licensed under an attribution Creative Commons BY-NC 2.0 Fr

Sponsors : GovernmentEurope-FEDERLa Réunion's CouncilLa Réunion's University